-------------------------
Via Workers World News Service
Reprinted from the July 15, 2004
issue of Workers World newspaper
-------------------------

COURT RULING THREATENS MUMIA ABU-JAMAL'S LIFE
Evidence to Prove his Innocence Still Unheard

By Monica Moorehead

On June 29, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit lifted its 
stay of proceedings in the case of death-row political prisoner Mumia 
Abu-Jamal and ordered a briefing on this matter. Robert R. Bryan, his 
lead attorney, says: "This should be a wake-up call to the movement. 
Mumia's case is now moving forward. He is in extremely grave danger. The 
authorities want to silence his voice and pen."

Mumia Abu-Jamal is one victim among millions who have been exploited and 
oppres sed by the anti-poor, unjust U.S. criminal justice system. The 
significance of his case, however, goes beyond his struggle against a 
racist judicial frame-up. Despite being physically isolated on death 
row, Abu-Jamal has used his words and audio commentaries to provide a 
powerful, distinct voice in the worldwide movement against imperialist 
war in Iraq and occupation in Palestine, Haiti and Afghanistan.

The circuit court had been awaiting a U.S. Supreme Court decision in the 
case of Beard v. Banks, which will lead to Mumia's execution if the 
prosecution has its way.

Bryan explains the significance of this complicated ruling: "The Supreme 
Court ruled on the appeal by Pennsylvania state authorities stemming 
from a Court of Appeals decision that invalidated the death sentence of 
George Banks, who has been on death row over 20 years for multiple 
murder. Mr. Banks' death sentence had been overturned by the Court of 
Appeals on the grounds that the instructions to the jury in Banks' case 
violated a Supreme Court ruling which held that jurors did not have to 
agree unanimously on the existence of mitigating circumstances in order 
to vote against the death penalty. The key issue in the Banks case was 
whether another case, Mills v. Maryland, 486 U.S. 367, decided in 1988, 
could be applied retroactively. The Court of Appeals for the Third 
Circuit had ruled that Mills was retroactive and therefore applied to 
Banks, which became final in 1987.

"In Mumia's case retroactivity regarding Banks/Mills was not an issue, 
since Mumia's proceeding was technically finalized in 1990 and therefore 
was fully covered by Mills. ... The U.S. Supreme Court reversed a 
critical portion of the Banks case on retroactivity, which held as 
unconstitutional capital sentencing schemes that require juries to 
disregard mitigating factors not found unanimously.

"The Supreme Court ruled that Mills did not apply retroactively. The 
court determined that the Banks conviction became final in 1987; thus, 
the 1988 Mills decision did not affect his case even though what had 
occurred was unconstitutional. Hence, Mr. Banks and some 30 other 
Pennsylvania death row inmates similarly situated could not benefit from 
the Mills decision and their original death penalty judgments must 
stand."

This crucial decision comes after more than four years of federal 
appeals. U.S. Federal District Judge William Yohn was assigned to Abu-
Jamal's case in October 1999. He was charged with determining whether 
Abu-Jamal should have an evidentiary hearing and new trial. Such a 
hearing would have allowed evidence that had been suppressed to finally 
be heard and entered into court record. That would give Abu-Jamal a 
chance to prove his innocence in the 1981 killing of Philadelphia 
police officer Daniel Faulkner.

Yohn issued a ruling on Dec. 18, 2001, that threw out the original death 
sentence for Mumia Abu-Jamal resulting from his 1982 trial. But Yohn 
upheld Abu-Jamal's conviction on the charge that he shot Faulkner. If 
Yohn's ruling had not been challenged within 180 days, Abu-Jamal would 
have gone through a new penalty trial that could have brought about 
either life imprisonment or, again, the death penalty.

The Philadelphia District Attorney's office, hoping to see Mumia 
executed, appealed Yohn's ruling. This led to the current ruling by the 
Third Circuit Court.

Attorney Bryan has appealed to the public: "The government knows that 
the only way to stop Mumia is to murder him in the name of the law, to 
execute him. In over three decades of litigating death-penalty cases, I 
have not seen one in which the government wants so badly to kill a 
client. We must not rest until Mumia is free."

Bryan is awaiting a ruling on a petition he filed in the Court of Common 
Pleas in Philadelphia concerning new evidence of innocence and 
prosecutorial misconduct during Mumia's original trial. Bryan will also 
be filing a petition in the U.S. District Court regarding a statement 
made by Judge Albert Sabo during Abu-Jamal's trial. Court stenographer 
Terri Maurer-Carter has signed a legal affidavit saying she overheard 
Sabo say about Abu-Jamal: "Yeah, and I'm going to help 'em fry the n----
r."

The political movement must be ready to mobilize in the streets to 
demand Abu-Jamal's freedom. Twice when Tom Ridge--now head of the 
federal Depart ment of Homeland Security--was governor of Pennsylvania, 
he tried to legally lynch this revolutionary journalist and former Black 
Panther. Both times, in August 1995 and October 1999, Abu-Jamal's 
supporters turned out in the thousands to stop his execution.

The powers-that-be want to forever silence him because of his belief in 
worldwide social revolution. That is why the movement must use every 
avenue to free him.

- END -

(Copyright Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to copy and 
distribute verbatim copies of this document, but changing it is not 
allowed. For more information contact Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, 
NY 10011; via e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe wwnews-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Support the 
voice of resistance http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php)





------------------
This message is sent to you by Workers World News Service.
To subscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to