On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:44 AM, fantasai <fantasai.li...@inkedblade.net> wrote: > I'm prepping the Values and Units draft for CR, and it > occurred to me it might be useful to have you review > this issue: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0298.html > which was resolved here: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0209.html > and resulted in this wording: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0029.html > > Please let me know if you have any comments substantively > or editorially. :)
That looks alright. I probably prefer some evolution of B. At some point CSS really needs to start thinking in terms of an object model and a syntax. And the syntax just feeds the object model, upon which everything else operates. So you wouldn't refer to 'url()' when serializing, but rather a CSS URL value object. And that object has some kind of internal slot (the local url flag), which we can also expose API-wise perhaps, etc. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/