I recommend you look at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core - there is a
better pattern for CURIE in there. It is the current best definition of
CURIE.
On 5/9/2012 10:25 PM, Brian M. Ames wrote:
The pattern given for CURIE in
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-curie-20101216 is ineffective for
validation since it matches anything but an empty string. That is to
say (([\i-[:]][\c-[:]]*)?:)?.+ is no different than .+ alone. An
alternative would be (([\i-[:]][\c-[:]]*)?:).+|([^:])+ which would
require any CURIE without a prefix but containing a colon to be
prefixed with a colon delimiter.
Example
a:1:more:time
:1:more:time
1 more time
would all be valid but
1:more:time
would not be.
--
Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
+1 763 786 8160 x120
