Hi,
John Labenski ha scritto:
On 2/21/06, Francesco Montorsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
John Labenski ha scritto:
On 2/21/06, Francesco Montorsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John,
I see there are various project files and Makefiles not
bakefile-generated scattered among the wxLua tree... could we remove them ?
If the makefiles are still up2date, I think we could keep them as
'safety' system in case bakefile-generated ones fail in some way.
I use all the "old" Makefiles regularly and I would like them to stay.
They are based on wx-config and should work in linux on any system
that has wx-config in their path. They're also very easy to understand
so that I can add profiling and other temporary things easily.
ok, sure.
Just one question: is there anything in hand-written makefiles which you
can't do with ./configure ?
Heh, I can understand the hand written ones and they're easy to
modify. The bakefile Makefiles are basically incomprehensible, there's
way too many conditions to make it parseable by a mortal at a glance.
that's true but rather bakefile themselves should be modified.
However I know that current situation (being forced to use a patched
bakefile) makes this not easy.
If the existing makefiles conflict with something, we can rename them
to Makefile.wx-config.
no need to do that; they do not conflict with anything as long as they
remain as they are...
Francesco
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wxlua-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
