On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:23:51 -0500, dan sinclair wrote: > Jannis Pohlmann wrote: > > I tried to run the submenu-collision test, which failed with the > > following (slightly simplified) diff: > > > > --- /tmp/menutestdir/run-result.filtered > > +++ /tmp/menutestdir/required-result.sorted > > +Applications/ > > kate.desktop /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/kate.desktop > > +Applications/ > > kbabel.desktop /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/kbabel.desktop > > +Applications/ > > KEdit.desktop /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/KEdit.desktop > > +Applications/ > > kwrite.desktop /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/kwrite.desktop > > +Applications/ > > quanta.desktop /tmp/menutestdir/xdg_data_dir/applications/quanta.desktop > > > > The test includes two menus which both have the name "Applications" > > and contain an <Include> rule. The test expects no output from the > > implementation. If I remember the specification correctly, a new > > menu should be created with the two <Include>'s added, which would > > look like this: > > > > Looking at the results file in the test suite it's expecting the > desktop's you listed as the results. It looks more like your > implementation isn't returning any desktop files.
Crap, you're right. I must have lost my mind during the almost seven hours spent with the test suite, hehe. Thanks. - Jannis _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg