On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 22:17:43 +0100 Axel Liljencrantz <liljencra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/3/4 Dieter Plaetinck <die...@plaetinck.be> > ... > > > > > > > Imho that would fall in the config section, because the user > > configured the variables explicitly. Note that state vs config is > > not about persistent vs not-persistent. "State" and "config" (just > > like "data", "cache" etc) are meant to categorize files. The fact > > that in your case your variables are first in memory and persisted > > to disk only later does not change their "nature" (which is config, > > imho) > > > > I didn't mean that the path the data takes while traveling to disk is > what made it into state, I was strictly talking about the nature of > the data stored. Another example. The next major fish release is > planned to use universal variables to share a common command history > between all running shells. Surely, that is state, not configuration? > I believe it was even mentioned earlier in this discussion as an > example of application state. > > Axel Yes indeed. that would be state :) Dieter _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
