On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ross Moore <ross.mo...@mq.edu.au> wrote: > With Xunicode loaded, does this not do what you want? > c\textsubring{b}c > > or cb^^^^0325c (with no extra package).
Yes, both of those work great! Thank you! Dan On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ross Moore <ross.mo...@mq.edu.au> wrote: > > On 30/10/2011, at 8:11 PM, Daniel Greenhoe wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Peter Dyballa <peter_dyba...@web.de> wrote: >>> With COMBINING RING BELOW, U+0325? >> >> Yes --- How do I in general put, for example, U+0325 below U+0062, >> while still maintaining proper alignment (e.g. the bottom of the "b" >> (U+0062) with a ring (U+0325) below it is still aligned with the >> bottom of an adjacent "c" (U+0063) with nothing below it)? > > With Xunicode loaded, does this not do what you want? > > c\textsubring{b}c > > or cb^^^^0325c (with no extra package). > > It is up to the font to implement the placement. > XeTeX just receives the codes for the characters/glyphs. > > You can write a macro to simplify the input, once you are > sure that you know what you want, and how to get it. > >> >> Dan > > > Hope this helps, > > Ross > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Ross Moore ross.mo...@mq.edu.au > Mathematics Department office: E7A-419 > Macquarie University tel: +61 (0)2 9850 8955 > Sydney, Australia 2109 fax: +61 (0)2 9850 8114 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex > -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex