On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote: > > > Has it been firmly established that this is a regression > > > and 4.2 worked fine on those machines?
You can verify this by using the generic int10 module from one of our ix86 binary packages for 4.2.0 or 4.2.1. > > It's not clear to me that you actually used the generic module for this > > test. Check the log. > You're right! It was still using the linux/libint10.a. > The generic libint10.a doesn't work. If I switch over, the > second head doesn't get posted correctly and I do see the > message about the BIOS getting truncated. That message should be coming out regardless of the int10 module you use. Marc. +----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Marc Aurele La France | work: 1-780-492-9310 | | Computing and Network Services | fax: 1-780-492-1729 | | 352 General Services Building | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | University of Alberta +-----------------------------------+ | Edmonton, Alberta | | | T6G 2H1 | Standard disclaimers apply | | CANADA | | +----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ XFree86 Core Team member. ATI driver and X server internals. _______________________________________________ XFree86 mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
