Actually, I think SPF is a superset of both RMX and DMP. http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf.02.9.4.txt
I personally like the simplicity of RMX, but any of the three solutions will cut down noticably on spam. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Aranki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 5:23 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: accept mail from real MX > I could be missing something, and I did not dig in too deep, but RMX and SPF > look an awful lot alike... > > -tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Shiloh Jennings > Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 5:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] Re: accept mail from real MX > > > > Don't see that IP in there do you???? Fails the test.... Not good. > > > > I agree. De-queued. > > > > > Understandable. What about implementing support for RMX? That is something > a lot of email servers will be moving toward in the near future, and it does > not cause any problems like the idea about simply using the MX. The > following link explains RMX. > http://www.danisch.de/work/security/txt/draft-danisch-dns-rr-smtp-00.txt > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body > of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line > "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
