Ups I think I don't understand something.
I call the function

if(xmlSecDSigCtxVerify(&dsigCtx, data->startNode) < 0)  

And how it look this function look in the KeyName and try to get the 
certificate from the registry.
But of course the certificate isn't registered. So, what if have to do the load 
the certificate which is
In the signed XML-doucument. How I can tell the function xmlSecDSigCtxVerify to 
get the certificate from the signed xml File and to don't try to look in the 
registry because there it will be not? So how I can handle this that I always 
load the certificate with which the document was signed.

Thanks
Jürgen


-----Original Message-----
From: Edward Shallow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Donnerstag, 01. Juni 2006 12:30
To: Jürgen Heiss; 'Aleksey Sanin'; xmlsec@aleksey.com
Subject: RE: [xmlsec] RE: Need urgent help for verify

What do you mean the document is no longer valid ?

If it verifies the References covered by the signature are valid. If the DN in 
the certificate refers to the same certifiacte as the friendly name in the 
KeyName, the KeyName is redundant. This is what I am doing. I am removing the 
Keyname for the verify and then putting it back in for consistency.

Alternatively you can tell xmlsec which key sources to consult using the 
enabledKeyData list. I find this a pain and prefer to check the keys in each 
location myself. If you have created the signature yourself and are 
subsequently verifying it, you know they are the same. They should rarely 
differ. In fact I cannot think of an instance where the contents of 
X509Certificate should get overridden by KeyName in a Verify. Even when 
including issuer certificates, they end up as more than one X509Certificate.
I buy that if X509Certifiate is not there one can consult KeyName, but rarely 
if ever the reverse. But that is just my opinion. I would like to see an order 
to the certificate search.

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jürgen Heiss
Sent: June 1, 2006 2:40 AM
To: Aleksey Sanin; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; xmlsec@aleksey.com
Subject: RE: [xmlsec] RE: Need urgent help for verify

Hi everybody,

Well you are right, its really the Keyname. So if I remove the Keyname it works.
But of course the document isn't anymore valid. Is there a way always to ignore 
the keyname and use the the certificate by verify a signed document?
 
What is the 

xmlSecDSigCtx::keyInfoReadCtx->enabledKeyData
xmlSecDSigCtx::keyInfoWriteCtx->enabledKeyData


For? How must I use them?

Thanks I advance.


Jürgen

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aleksey Sanin
Sent: Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2006 22:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; xmlsec@aleksey.com
Subject: Re: [xmlsec] RE: Need urgent help for verify

Yes

xmlSecDSigCtx::keyInfoReadCtx->enabledKeyData
xmlSecDSigCtx::keyInfoWriteCtx->enabledKeyData

Aleksey

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes you are right !!! I forgot about that.
>  
> You mean the "--enabled-key-data" list in the command line utility ? 
> Where is this in the API ? in the Ctx ?
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Aleksey Sanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Jürgen Heiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; xmlsec@aleksey.com
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 2:31:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [xmlsec] RE: Need urgent help for verify
> 
>  > Does it not make sense to check X509Certificate first ? Or must we
> > consciously remove KeyName to avoid problems in the mscrypto world
> where  > the chances of actually having the public verification 
> certificate in  > the verifiers mscrypto store is remote at best ?
>  >
> I think, that either signer or verifier should decide if KeyName makes 
> sense for him/her or not. In xmlsec, there is a way to disable KeyName 
> usage for verification, for example.
> 
> Aleksey
_______________________________________________
xmlsec mailing list
xmlsec@aleksey.com
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec

_______________________________________________
xmlsec mailing list
xmlsec@aleksey.com
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec



_______________________________________________
xmlsec mailing list
xmlsec@aleksey.com
http://www.aleksey.com/mailman/listinfo/xmlsec

Reply via email to