On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:58:50 -0700, Aaron Plattner <aplatt...@nvidia.com> > wrote: > >> In addition to the above, this commit also broke the Compiz >> "Wallpaper" plugin. > > Ok, as usual, Dave Airlie is right here -- independent of whether this > patch is a good idea (and I think it is), it should be reverted until it > doesn't cause a regression.
Yup, and that's why I acked it in the first place. It doesn't reduce GPU/CPU parallelism and it's not new semantics for the damage extension. If the post-op reporting worked correctly, the only difference would be in the case where a damage event overflows the clients protocol buffer. And in that case, the only difference would be that the driver gets to see the rendering request before X flushes the buffer. There's really nothing to discuss. Kristian _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
