On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:16:23 +0300, Erkki Seppala <erkki.sepp...@vincit.fi> wrote: > On 05.04.2011 18:58, Keith Packard wrote: > > On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:38:41 +0300, Erkki Seppala<erkki.sepp...@vincit.fi> > > wrote: > >> On 05.04.2011 17:54, Keith Packard wrote: > >>> Please just fix users of the existing 'Hash' function to call > >>> HashResourceID directly. > >> > >> Hm, are you sure? It looks like this afterwards: > > +Hash(int client, XID id) > > Am I looking at the wrong branch? (this is client-tracking-v2) > > You are looking at the correct branch. It was the diff replacing all > existing calls to Hash with HashResourceID, resulting in some > duplicity:
Ok, just a stale git repository; perhaps there was some lag between your mail and the git tree being visible or something. This looks ready to merge, and I would be replying with such a message if test/Makefile.am wasn't separately updated since the place you branched from. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgppPw3Xp3wux.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
