On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Kristian Høgsberg <k...@bitplanet.net> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> From: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com> >>> >>> So we reserve bits 16->19 for offload device ids, this means we can >>> have 6 offload devices, which is plenty for now, and we can bump >>> this further later without fear. >>> >>> v2: I suck at maths, that is all. Fixed up the maths to match reality. >>> v2.1: fix typo >> >> Looks fine to me. Is there a version bump that goes along with this >> so drivers can know they can ask for prime devices or should they just >> try and expect a NULL reply if it's not available? > > Drivers don't ever know about prime, its all hidden in the > server/libGL/dri2 layers.
Ah, I meant client side / aiglx there, ie how does the caller know that there are prime device types available. But just asking and getting NULL sounds fine. Kristian _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel