On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 01:03:33 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 15 September 2016 at 15:12, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote: [...] > > For 1, 3, 4, 5, 7 (assuming 10 goes in in some way): > > Reviewed-by: Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> > > > Thanks, can you push 1, 3, 4, 5 (and 7 ?). I'm short on commit access. > Pushed 1, 3, 4, 5, 6. Skipped 7 because it sounds like mesa can be downloaded over https as well.
[...] > > 9 seems to add a new requirement that I'm not sure is ok. > On the contrary it should remove/simplify things. > > But as the commit mentions, if people prefer I can rework to have an > option in a --dist vs --distcheck line manner. Keeping it "off" by > default, with the long term goal to make it "on" by default. > I don't think adding an option is a good idea, but I also don't know what problem this is trying to fix... Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
