On 19/09/18 17:54, Keith Packard wrote:
Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> writes:
Hi Keith,
sorry to bump in, but do you mean that a lessee doing drmDropMaster()
will both succeed and drop master also for the lessor (and recursively
through the whole leasing tree up and down as a consequence)?
If that call weren't disabled for lessees, then yes. And, that's why
patch 761e05a702f5d537ffcca1ba933f9f0a968aa022 was added...
And the ioctl will return EINVAL...
What is the motivation behind such asymmetry?
BTW, what is 'mastern'? (DRM_DEBUG_LEASE("Attempt to drop lessee %d as mastern",
file_priv->master->lessee_id);)
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
