On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 14:04 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > The attached patch is code we've used in Xsun for years, and our Sun Ray > people recently hit the same issue again in their Xorg 1.2-based Xnewt > server port. It simply changes the Xserver to always use a filename > containing the display number for xkm output, so that if two servers are > starting at once with the same keymap they don't overwrite or delete > each other's xkm files. While we're probably more likely to hit this > on Sun Ray servers which can have hundreds of X servers running, I think > it could also hit a single user machine with :0 & :1 starting on different > vt's at the same time. > > (Of course, the oft-mentioned change of not forking xkbcomp to compile to > xkm would also solve this, but this is a much simpler short-term fix.) > > Does this look good to everyone? Anyone know of a reason it would not > be a good idea?
Hey, it deletes code, how can it not be good. Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
