On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 03:34:04PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 06:23:09PM -0200, Paulo C?sar Pereira de Andrade > wrote: > > The patch as a whole may not be required to apply, and not > > that patch "verbatim", as it would require still at least a > > review to ensure every sdk header "passes" the: > > ifdef HAVE_FOO_CONFIG_H > > #include <foo-config.h> > > #endif > > It's failure-prone, and increases the amount of work for developers. > I didn't see any figures on how much faster the build would be, > to compensate for this.
With any non-braindead compiler, it is the same as just including the file with include guards. E.g. GCC knows about such include files and optimises the include away for any but the first time. Joerg _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
