> It looks like the intention was to merge them all into one file, but there > are still missing symbols from the old -aux, -atom, -event that are not in > the new lib (some of which were mentioned in the ChangeLog, others which > weren't) > > So, do I need to ship two versions of xcb-util to customers, or is this going > to be reversed to fix binary compatibility? >
An outdated ModularDevelopersGuide is a good way to put potential testers off, but breaking compatibility is an even better way to reduce the number of people actually testing the prerelease tree. cu, Knut _______________________________________________ xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com
