On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:35:42AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: >Maybe this is already common knowledge, but it surprised me. > >I was reviewing the patches I sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and noticed >that a patch I submitted got corrupted. > >The message: > >http://www.xfree86.org/devel/archives/patch/2002-Sep/0008.shtml > >The attachment: > >http://www.xfree86.org/devel/archives/patch/2002-Sep/handle_vetoed_suspend.diff > >This is the troublesome line: > >+ if (errno = EBUSY) > >Of course that shouldn't be an assignment...and, in fact, it wasn't in >the mail I sent out. I think there is a bug in a MIME parser somewhere, >probably in hypermail, that collapsed the == to a =. > >I don't know how the process of patch merging works, but this sort of >corruption of attachments could really waste some time and introduce >some subtle bugs.
It looks like a problem with the mail archiver. The copy I have in my mailbox is as it should be (and that's what I always use). David -- David Dawes Release Engineer/Architect The XFree86 Project www.XFree86.org/~dawes _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
