hi!
Nick Wellnhofer, 2018-09-26 23:40:
On Sep 26, 2018, at 20:17 , Nikolai Weibull via xslt
<xslt@gnome.org> wrote:
I have no suggestion as to why this is happening, but I assume
it has something to do with the latest modifications of the
handling of functions and result trees fragments and such.
Yes, in one of my previous commits, I made an assumption that
turned out to be wrong. The issue should be fixed now:
Great, thank you!
Thanks for the report and sorry for the inconvenience. The
memory management of result tree fragments in func:results is
hairy stuff.
Hey, no problem, I’m just glad I found a simple test case for it.
And yes, that code looks particularly messy. It’s a good thing
that you seem to know it well.
Best,
Nikolai
_______________________________________________
xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
xslt@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
