On 12.06.2020 at 13:31, Nick Wellnhofer wrote: > On 12/06/2020 12:32, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
>> Could someone please clarify whether the current behavior is intentional? > > It's probably intentional. I agree that the input document should be > left untouched but in this case, the modification doesn't look too > problematic. There are other situations [1] where libxslt makes more > destructive changes to the input document. > > [1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxslt/-/issues/14 Thanks! I agree that this modification isn't particularly problematic, and given that existing code might rely on it, it might be better to leave that as is. :) -- Christoph M. Becker _______________________________________________ xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ xslt@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
