On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 15:45:01 +0100 "Jeroen Breedveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The two bugs I found are now solved so I think we could release a new > distribution now. Do you have the time to do this? Because I'm busy with setting up the new XML:DB web server. There should already be an Ant target for building a distribution... > There are other issues that I have addressed in the mailinglist but they > should be discussed more extensively before changing anything in the > code. Yup. > Those issues are: > > -Switching over to DOM2 compatibility only. That means removing the > createElement() and setAttributeNode() functions. The advantage is less > code and gaining full compatibilty with DOM2 (getLocalName() is not null > anymore for DOM2 applications without namespaces). The disadvantage is > losing DOM1-only compatibility. Personally I'm for losing DOM1-only > compatibility since it is in the way of full compatibility with a newer > version of the DOM standard. I'm +1 here. > -The position of namespace declaration when inserting elements that have > namespaces that do not exist yet in the "xupdated" document. I think we > should go for something similar to XSLT or the upcoming DOM3 LS > specification. > > Also, I noticed that unit-test have dissappeared from the new > distribution. I would like to add new unit-tests based on the old > unit-tests, the unit-tests I added for X-Hive/DB binding of Lexus (the > ones I used to found the two bugs). This is an interesting point. If you want to check in your test suite - go ahead. :-) Lars. -- ______________________________________________________________________ Lars Martin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMB GmbH http://www.smb-tec.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact administrator: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Read archived messages: http://archive.xmldb.org/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------
