Larson, Timothy E. wrote: > W.B. McNamara wrote: >>> It does if you click on the + sign itself rather than the term. I do >>> this all the time myself. >>> >> That's a good usability point. Half the time I do this, too, >> basically seeing the "+ foo" as a single unit rather than a "+" and a >> "foo", no matter how many times I make the mistake. > > I do think it needs a larger target than just the "+". Since these > are the related tags, and the full tag list is just below, my thought > would also be that these links would lead to currentTag+relatedTag. I > understand that some people would want to see _only_ the related tag, > though.
Or alternatively, mark the related tags in the "tags" listing with a class (in the HTML), like the "cur"rent tag is now. Apply a style so they stand out. (Suggestion: prefix with the "~" character to denote similarity/relatedness.) Then everything in the "related tags" listing can be links to currentTag+relatedTag - so you retain the current functionality, reduce redundancy, and eliminate the problem of the small target. I think it would be readily apparent that the specially marked "tags" are same as the "related tags". Tim -- Tim Larson West Corporation, Interactive TeleServices _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@del.icio.us http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
