Hi Gavin, On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Gav... <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote: > Hi All, > > Currently you have 6133* files [1][2]without an ASL v2.0 license header. > This means they are either unlicensed or have > the old ez.no license header and/or other GPL/LPGL licenses. >
As far as I can see only test files do not have (or have incorrect) license headers. > These all need changing/removing and ASL v2.0 license headers adding. > > * - 6133 files are tested in 'trunk' only so far, none of your other > branches have been checked yet but they will be next. > > (your website pages also do not pass validator tests but that's also for > another time) > > I am offering to help migrate your files (a chunk at a time) to use the > Apache License. > > Let me know if this offer is appreciated/wanted and I'll get started and > provide patches. > It is. I have one question though: How non text/plain files are supposed to be handled regarding the license ? For example Archive/tests/data/ezpublish.ott is an OpenOffice.org file, does it require any license header as well ? If so adding a license for that kind of document might break a couple of tests. > (as an aside, in my own quest to learn more about various projects Git > workflows I'd also like > to provide some of these patches via git patch and/or pull requests etc so > please let me know > how I can do that at any stage and if its welcomed) > Would it be acceptable for you to use the reviewboard instance ? Thanks :) -- Jérôme Renard http://39web.fr | http://jrenard.info | http://twitter.com/jeromerenard
