Hi Maxime, On 04/14/2011 11:26 AM, Maxime Thomas wrote:
> I think it's a bit restrictive to permit only commiters to access this tool, > which has to be shared with everybody. > I understand that there's a ring of commiters, knowing the value and skills > of each others, trying to protect the project and the source code. > I think it's a good point to have these guys, specially because they have > made all the work so far. that is not the intention. We discussed usage of a wiki earlier here on the list, but the scenario, where certain areas of the wiki are open for everyone, is not realizable in Confluence by now. Therefore I proposed to leave it closed and try out if and how we use it, before taking further steps. As a next step I'd propose to create a "zetacomponents-developers" group in the wiki, which would have full permissions, and add all people from the mailinglist, who want to have access. What we want to avoid is pollution of the wiki with unstructured content, which is the basic problem with all wikis. > However, AZC community needs to open up and let some people get in so we can > democratize the product. > Like I'm not a commiter and I would like to share what I've learned from AZC > with others, I won't be able to share in a formal way through the AZC Wiki. > The worst point is to work for all this, to spend time and finally to have > nothing at the end. > Maybe we have a trust scale to define with intermediate levels between noone > and commiter. I fully agree with your arguments and the ASF even forces us to go this way. I'm all up for the solution proposed above if nobody objects. Would that satisfy you? Regards, Toby -- Tobias Schlitt http://schlitt.info GPG Key: 0xC462BC14 Want to hire me? Need quality assurance? http://qafoo.com eZ Components are Zeta Components now! http://bit.ly/9S7zbn
