On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote: >>> It was changes like this one >>> http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/src/Products/PluginIndexes/DateIndex/DateIndex.py?rev=115442&r1=115279&r2=115442 >> >> I don't understand how the BTree changes would run afoul of this. >> This code should prevent the BTree from overflowing in the first place, no? > > It should. But it failed to recognize that a Python int on a 64bit > platform is too large to fit into an IITreeSet. For some reason this > problem only started showing up after the BTree fixes.
Well, Hmph. I guess if Nathan can't run 3.8.6 (or 3.9), 3.8.4 should be OK, as the fix is for a false positive of a problem. Jim -- Jim Fulton _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
