This sounds great. I would suggest opening a Jira to work out the
proposal and track the patch.

ben

Hiram Chirino wrote:
> Yep, I've looked that the test cases. In short to make that public API
> more DI friendly, we should:
>
> * Decouple the current configuration system from the public API.  I
> see stuff like ZooKeeperServer being coupled to ServerConfig a bit.
> * Allow the use of setter injection in addition to constructor
> injection. This is the most important thing needed to let spring more
> easily configure the objects.
>
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> Hi Hiram,
>>
>>  Thanks for your feedback. Its great to hear from our users.
>>
>> About your question regarding injecting zookeeper servers in
>> applications, we do have public api' that support creating zookeeper
>> servers in an embedding application. Take a look at our test cases where
>> we create zookeeper servers via the public api. Is this what you were
>> looking for or I misunderstood the reference?
>>
>> Mahadev
>>
>>     
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram
>>> Chirino
>>> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 9:07 AM
>>> To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org
>>> Subject: An interest in increasing the DI'ness of ZooKeeper?
>>>
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> First off, great project!  I think ZooKeeper is a fabulous idea.  I
>>> can see folks wanting to embedd ZK servers in their products too.  I
>>> could see the ActiveMQ project embedding it for several reasons.  And
>>> with that in mind,  I think it would be awesome of ZK tried to use
>>> more dependency injection (DI) to configure it's objects.  That way
>>> and embedding project could directly configure it with java code, or
>>> use Spring or Guice etc. etc.
>>>
>>> If you guys are interested in supporting this use case, I'd be happy
>>> to start contributing patches to make that happen.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Hiram
>>>
>>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>>>
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://open.iona.com
>>>       
>
>
>
>   

Reply via email to