Tuning GC is going to be critical, otw all the sessions will timeout (and
potentially expire) during GC pauses.

Patrick

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Maarten Koopmans <maar...@vrijheid.net>wrote:

> Yes, and syncing after a crash will be interesting as well. Off note; I am
> running it with a 6GB heap now, but it's not filled yet. I do have smoke
> tests thoug, so maybe I'll give it a try.
>
>
>
> Op 5 okt. 2010 om 21:13 heeft Benjamin Reed <br...@yahoo-inc.com> het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> >
> > you will need to time how long it takes to read all that state back in
> and adjust the initTime accordingly. it will probably take a while to pull
> all that data into memory.
> >
> > ben
> >
> > On 10/05/2010 11:36 AM, Avinash Lakshman wrote:
> >> I have run it over 5 GB of heap with over 10M znodes. We will definitely
> run
> >> it with over 64 GB of heap. Technically I do not see any limitiation.
> >> However I will the experts chime in.
> >>
> >> Avinash
> >>
> >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Mahadev Konar<maha...@yahoo-inc.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Maarteen,
> >>>  I definitely know of a group which uses around 3GB of memory heap for
> >>> zookeeper but never heard of someone with such huge requirements. I
> would
> >>> say it definitely would be a learning experience with such high memory
> >>> which
> >>> I definitely think would be very very useful for others in the
> community as
> >>> well.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> mahadev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 10/5/10 11:03 AM, "Maarten Koopmans"<maar...@vrijheid.net>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I just wondered: has anybody ever ran zookeeper "to the max" on a 68GB
> >>>> quadruple extra large high memory EC2 instance? With, say, 60GB
> allocated
> >>> or
> >>>> so?
> >>>>
> >>>> Because EC2 with EBS is a nice way to grow your zookeeper cluster
> (data
> >>> on the
> >>>> ebs columes, upgrade as your memory utilization grows....)  - I just
> >>> wonder
> >>>> what the limits are there, or if I am foing where angels fear to
> tread...
> >>>>
> >>>> --Maarten
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to