Hi Mark,

Please, read my comments about your patch.

Sorry Martin, looks like this issue isn't yours.

Best Regards,
Alexey

Alexey Ushakov wrote:
Hi Martin,

I'm currently looking into
http://www.jroller.com/dgilbert/entry/jfreechart_and_jxlayer
issue and your patch. Unfortunately we're all working in parallel on many different project, so I'm unable to dedicate all my time for this task. Currently, I did verify that your fix does solve the problem but need more time to go through all the details of pisces AA engine to be sure that everything is OK. I'll let you know about any progress on this.

Best Regards,
Alexey

Martin von Gagern wrote:
Hi Igor,

thanks for your status update.

Igor Nekrestyanov wrote:
My understanding of current situation with Martin's fixes is the following:
 - for 2 of Martin's fixes internal formal review procedure is in progress
   (we do review all changes and save approved webrevs and this is
   another reason why we ask for webrevs for contributions)
   Unfortunately this procedure is not public and therefore it is hard
   to track it status. However, it should not take long.

A short mail saying "Hi, I'm <youNameHere>, I'll now start to review
this and get back to you when I have questions or reached a verdict"
would be a first step towards tracking that state, until more elaborate
tracking tools and mechanisms become available.

 - one of the suggested fixes actually introduces incompatibility in the
   behavior
   and such change has to be reviewed by CCC committee (this is how we
   call it internally,
   not sure what will be public name when it become public process)
   [My understanding of incompatibility is: metadata written by "fixed"
   jdk will not be parsed normally by older jdk]

Thanks, I'll look at this again, see if I have improvements or
additional information to add regarding this. If so, I'll use the
appropriate thread.

  Andrew Brygin (who actually works on these 3 submissions) will provide
more accurate details about these 3 bugs later today.

Great! Looking forward to that.

Martin



Reply via email to