Hi Igor, thanks for your status update.
Igor Nekrestyanov wrote: > My understanding of current situation with Martin's fixes is the following: > - for 2 of Martin's fixes internal formal review procedure is in progress > (we do review all changes and save approved webrevs and this is > another reason why we ask for webrevs for contributions) > Unfortunately this procedure is not public and therefore it is hard > to track it status. However, it should not take long. A short mail saying "Hi, I'm <youNameHere>, I'll now start to review this and get back to you when I have questions or reached a verdict" would be a first step towards tracking that state, until more elaborate tracking tools and mechanisms become available. > - one of the suggested fixes actually introduces incompatibility in the > behavior > and such change has to be reviewed by CCC committee (this is how we > call it internally, > not sure what will be public name when it become public process) > [My understanding of incompatibility is: metadata written by "fixed" > jdk will not be parsed normally by older jdk] Thanks, I'll look at this again, see if I have improvements or additional information to add regarding this. If so, I'll use the appropriate thread. > Andrew Brygin (who actually works on these 3 submissions) will provide > more accurate details about these 3 bugs later today. Great! Looking forward to that. Martin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
