Phil Race wrote: > I recall that we refactored the patch to touch fewer of the littlecms > internals. This helped since just 4 days after that patch the littlecms > version was upgraded from 1.16 to 1.18. I'd be surprised if you have > only this patch and not the littlecms 1.18 patch. Maybe its 1.18 > rather than this changeset that's the root of the problem. > > FYI, the code in 6-open and jdk7 should now, I think, be identical.
I don't know where you might have got the idea that I don't have the littlecms 1.18 patch; I certainly do! OK, so I'll open a bug for a JCK failure. Is it sufficient simply to cite the test and the error message? I have a webrev that I'll send as soon as there is a bugzilla entry to attach it to. Andrew.
