Andrew Haley wrote:
Phil Race wrote:
I recall that we refactored the patch to touch fewer of the littlecms
internals. This helped since just 4 days after that patch the littlecms
version was upgraded from 1.16 to 1.18. I'd be surprised if you have
only this patch and not the littlecms 1.18 patch. Maybe its 1.18
rather than this changeset that's the root of the problem.
FYI, the code in 6-open and jdk7 should now, I think, be identical.
I don't know where you might have got the idea that I don't have the
littlecms 1.18 patch; I certainly do!
Since you mentioned a changeset which was since completely blown
away by a subsequent one ..
OK, so I'll open a bug for a JCK failure. Is it sufficient simply
to cite the test and the error message? I have a webrev that I'll
send as soon as there is a bugzilla entry to attach it to.
I think so.
-phil.
