> I think so, but Phil knows more about the scripts that verify a push. > > I think they do look for the bugids in the regression tests so I don't > know what happens if they find a mismatch. I think you are probably OK > as long as one of the tests lists the bug you are claiming to fix on > that push...
By the way, is the cubic solver improvement good to go? I tried to address the last concerns and questions you had about it in this e-mail: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2011-January/001769.html where I also propose some concrete documentation changes. Thank you, Denis. ----- Original Message ----- > > ...jim > > On 1/19/11 10:57 AM, Denis Lila wrote: > >> In general, if you can, you should write a short regression test > >> and > >> push it with your checkin. I probably should have mentioned that > >> before > >> you pushed since these bugs sound like they are conducive to a tiny > >> automatic regression test. > > > > Sorry about that. > > > >> At this point we'd need a new bugid to push any regression tests. > >> Is > >> there another bugid associated with this general set of problems > >> that > >> we > >> could use to generate them and push them? > > > > The cubic solver is somewhat related. Should I push any regression > > tests > > with that? > > > > Regards, > > Denis.
