From that email on we started diving into the containment methods
instead of solveCubic and the email you refer to doesn't have a webrev
link to the code with your changes. Is there a final webrev for the
solveCubic changes?
...jim
On 1/21/2011 1:00 PM, Denis Lila wrote:
I think so, but Phil knows more about the scripts that verify a push.
I think they do look for the bugids in the regression tests so I don't
know what happens if they find a mismatch. I think you are probably OK
as long as one of the tests lists the bug you are claiming to fix on
that push...
By the way, is the cubic solver improvement good to go? I tried to
address the last concerns and questions you had about it in this e-mail:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2011-January/001769.html
where I also propose some concrete documentation changes.
Thank you,
Denis.
