Hi Jonathan,
sorry for the long delay. I think the change look good now.
Can you please slightly update the comment in the 31-33 to something like:
# This file references the standard Latin Type1 fonts from the AIX package
# X11.fnt.iso_T1 and the Unicode TrueType fonts from X11.fnt.ucs.ttf. They
# are located by default under "/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/{Type1,TrueType}"
# and sym-linked to "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/".
And can you please also change "iso10646-1" to "iso8859-1" in the
following lines:
44
dialog.plain.latin-1=-*-helvetica-medium-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1
57 dialog.bold.latin-1=-*-helvetica-bold-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1
70
dialog.italic.latin-1=-*-helvetica-medium-o-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1
83
dialog.bolditalic.latin-1=-*-helvetica-bold-o-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1
96
dialoginput.plain.latin-1=-*-courier-medium-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-m-*-iso10646-1
109
dialoginput.bold.latin-1=-*-courier-bold-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-m-*-iso10646-1
122
dialoginput.italic.latin-1=-*-courier-medium-o-normal--*-%d-100-100-m-*-iso10646-1
135
dialoginput.bolditalic.latin-1=-*-courier-bold-o-normal--*-%d-100-100-m-*-iso10646-1
148
sansserif.plain.latin-1=-*-helvetica-medium-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1
161
sansserif.bold.latin-1=-*-helvetica-bold-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1
174
sansserif.italic.latin-1=-*-helvetica-medium-o-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1
187
sansserif.bolditalic.latin-1=-*-helvetica-bold-o-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1
200 serif.plain.latin-1=-*-times new
roman-medium-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1
213 serif.bold.latin-1=-*-times new
roman-bold-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1
227 serif.italic.latin-1=-*-times new
roman-medium-i-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1
240 serif.bolditalic.latin-1=-*-times new
roman-bold-i-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1
253
monospaced.plain.latin-1=-*-courier-medium-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-m-*-iso10646-1
266
monospaced.bold.latin-1=-*-courier-bold-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-m-*-iso10646-1
279
monospaced.italic.latin-1=-*-courier-medium-o-normal--*-%d-100-100-m-*-iso10646-1
292
monospaced.bolditalic.latin-1=-*-courier-bold-o-normal--*-%d-100-100-m-*-iso10646-1
336
filename.-*-courier-medium-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-m-*-iso10646-1=/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/cour.pfa
337
filename.-*-courier-bold-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-m-*-iso10646-1=/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/courb.pfa
338
filename.-*-courier-medium-o-normal--*-%d-100-100-m-*-iso10646-1=/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/couri.pfa
339
filename.-*-courier-bold-o-normal--*-%d-100-100-m-*-iso10646-1=/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/courbi.pfa
340
filename.-*-helvetica-medium-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1=/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/helv.pfa
341
filename.-*-helvetica-bold-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1=/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/helvb.pfa
342
filename.-*-helvetica-medium-o-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1=/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/helvi.pfa
343
filename.-*-helvetica-bold-o-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1=/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/helvbi.pfa
344
filename.-*-times_new_roman-medium-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1=/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/tnr.pfa
345
filename.-*-times_new_roman-bold-r-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1=/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/tnrb.pfa
346
filename.-*-times_new_roman-medium-i-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1=/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/tnri.pfa
347
filename.-*-times_new_roman-bold-i-normal--*-%d-100-100-p-*-iso10646-1=/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/tnrbi.pfa
I know that you merged them from the original file, but I think they
were wrong from the beginning (I have to blame:) because the Type1
fonts are no Unicode fonts.
Sorry for the extra work, but I think it will be better that way.
Regarding the missing entries for the "latin-2, latin-4, cyrillic,
arabic, greek, hebrew, latin-5, latin-9" compared to the original IBM
version of the fontcontfig file, I think that's no problem. If we only
have the Type1 fonts we can't display them anyway. And if we have the
Unicode TrueType fonts the corresponding encodings work even without
the concrete mapping (at least what I have tried out).
Thanks for your patience and best regards,
Volker
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Jonathan Lu <luc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hello 2d-dev, Volker,
>
> Could I have the updated patch reviewed ?
> any more comments ?
>
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Jonathan Lu <luc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Volker,
>>
>> I've updated the patch by dropping the those fonts configurations from
>> $JRE_LIB_FONTS directory.
>> The change is based on the SAP version, current change is primarily adding
>> support for CJK fonts, pls review.
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/JDK-8034218.v2/
>>
>> Thanks
>> Jonathan
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Volker Simonis <volker.simo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jonathan,
>>>
>>> from all fontconfig files in make/data/fontconfig,
>>> solaris.fontconfig.properties is the only file which contains a single
>>> line referring to $JRE_LIB_FONTS. This is obviously a first-day bug
>>> which should be fixed.
>>>
>>> It simply makes no sense to define font files and default fonts with
>>> references to files which won't be in a JDK for sure. Again, if you
>>> could convince IBM to donate the corresponding fonts to the OpenJDK
>>> that would be great. Otherwise these entries should be dropped from
>>> the fontconfig files.
>>>
>>> Thank you and best regards,
>>> Volker
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Jonathan Lu <luc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Phil, Volker,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for your comments, but I noticed that JRE_LIB_FONTS has been
>>> > referred
>>> > by the solaris fontconfig file,
>>> >
>>> > jdk/make/data/fontconfig/solaris.fontconfig.properties
>>> >
>>> > So I'm wondering if we can do this in the same way as Solaris platform.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Jonathan
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Phil Race <philip.r...@oracle.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> removed awt-dev ...
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> > I don't think we should reference the fonts
>>> >> > under $JRE_LIB_FONTS/ in the OpenJDK version of
>>> >> > fontconfig.properties
>>> >>
>>> >> Volker is correct on this point.
>>> >>
>>> >> Since OpenJDK can't ship those fonts we made sure they were never used
>>> >> in any openjdk fontconfig file.
>>> >>
>>> >> -phil.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On 05/12/2014 09:42 AM, Phil Race wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> All,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> If you want to continue this discussion i should be restarted on
>>> >>> 2d-dev
>>> >>> and awt-dev removed. AWT has nothing to do with the fonts ..
>>> >>> I've fixed the bug sub-cat.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -phil.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 05/12/2014 09:06 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Hi Jonathan,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> thanks for submitting this patch.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Overall it looks good, but I don't think we should reference the
>>> >>>> fonts
>>> >>>> under $JRE_LIB_FONTS/ in the OpenJDK version of
>>> >>>> fontconfig.properties
>>> >>>> (at least not until IBM will not also contribute the corresponding
>>> >>>> fonts :)
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I would also find it helpful to keep a reworked version of the
>>> >>>> comment:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 27 # Minimal version for AIX using the standard Latin Type1 Fonts
>>> >>>> from the
>>> >>>> 28 # package X11.fnt.iso_T1. These fonts are installed by default
>>> >>>> into
>>> >>>> 29 # "/usr/lpp/X11/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" and sym-linked to
>>> >>>> "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> which mentions which AIX packages provide the other referenced font
>>> >>>> files.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Thank you and best regards,
>>> >>>> Volker
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Jonathan Lu
>>> >>>> <luc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Hi awt-dev,
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Please review the fix for issue:
>>> >>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034218
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> The changes are placed at
>>> >>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~luchsh/JDK-8034218/
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> This patch is trying to provide a better fonctconfig.properties
>>> >>>>> file
>>> >>>>> for AIX
>>> >>>>> platform,
>>> >>>>> which contains support for more languages, like CJK.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Thanks
>>> >>>>> Jonathan
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>
>>
>
> Many thanks
> Jonathan
