My off-list question was this:

> I am probably missing something, but with respect to the TIFF writer, why is 
> it necessary to move old lines 2607-2610 to new lines 2596-2599? In the old 
> version, for whatever it’s worth, the tile offset and byte count are written 
> before the abort, so if one wanted for some reason to read the output image 
> up to the point of where the write is aborted the last tile would be 
> accessible whereas in the new code it would not be.


Thanks,

Brian

On Sep 26, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote:

> Seems OK .. modulo Brian's off-list question about TIFF

Reply via email to