My off-list question was this: > I am probably missing something, but with respect to the TIFF writer, why is > it necessary to move old lines 2607-2610 to new lines 2596-2599? In the old > version, for whatever it’s worth, the tile offset and byte count are written > before the abort, so if one wanted for some reason to read the output image > up to the point of where the write is aborted the last tile would be > accessible whereas in the new code it would not be.
Thanks, Brian On Sep 26, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com> wrote: > Seems OK .. modulo Brian's off-list question about TIFF