On 12/14/2016 01:40 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi Phil,
On 12/14/2016 1:40 AM, Phil Race wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for checking that.
The bit I don't like here is that the end-user can then no longer ask
for collation
at all on Linux even though it has some chance of working on some
versions.
This is the case even without my change and collate option is disabled
for PrinterJob.
My fix (?) makes it disabled for PrintJob too.
Ah yes.
Hmm ..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31056278/postscript-file-is-not-collating-when-cups-copies-is-set
---
In our cups class we were doing a cupsAddOption("copies", "2",.. and
cupsAddOption("Collate", "True", .. commands (see examples below). It
turns out the the cups "copies" command was killing the Collating if
it set to 2. Like the orientation postscript/cups conflict you need
to set the cups copies value to 1 to get the collation to work. The
postscript file already knows its going to print out, for example 2
copies.
---
We set NumCopies in the Postscript along with collate :-
mPSStream.print(isCollated() ? " /Collate true":"");
mPSStream.print(" /NumCopies " +getCopiesInt());
So when we exec we also do "lp -# 2 .. " or whatever do set copies.
We are setting copies to 1 in
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/file/dc658d7dde90/src/java.desktop/share/classes/sun/print/PSPrinterJob.java#l735.
OK.
One thing is that, in my testing in ubuntu14.04 "collation" is working
and "uncollation" is not working. When I print 2 copies and do not
select "collate" option in printer dialog [I enabled collate option by
commenting out the isLinux check from
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/file/a21bac70753d/src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/print/IPPPrintService.java#l1062]
then, it prints Page 0, Page 1, Page 0, Page 1 [same as, when I
checked "collate" option] in my Ricoh printer in double-sided print. I
think for uncollation, it should print Page 0, Page 0 back-to-back in
1 copy and Page1-Page1 in another copy, right?
Yes, uncollated should be as you say.
What is going on ??? Is this for PrinterJob or PrintJob or both ?
I need to configure a printer on my Ubuntu .. I lost them recently when
my hard drive went bad.
-phil..
Regards
Prasanta
Does it help if we stop doing that for the collated case ?
-phil.
On 12/10/2016 12:19 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
On 12/10/2016 4:58 AM, Phil Race wrote:
Regarding being hard-coded for "Selection", the point there is that
in the AWT code path we always generate Postscript, whereas in the
2D path we may send some other content. Since we generate
Postscript my instinct here is that Collate should always work
since that gets embedded in the Postscript. The CUPS filter should
then do whatever is necessary to generate the right number of
collated or uncollated copies for the printer. I tracked down the
changeset that has the code you reference
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/dead66347eca If you
read the bug report for that :
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8016737 then it becomes
clear (sort of) that this was a workaround for the oddity that
Collate worked on Ubuntu 12.04 but not on Ubuntu 13.04, so the idea
was to stop saying it was supported. That is very annoying of
course and I'd love to know if we've rechecked from the source that
"CUPS does not report collate as a supported attribute"
I checked getAttMap (response received from cups)
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/file/dc658d7dde90/src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/print/IPPPrintService.java#l1767
and there is no "collate-supported" attribute in there.
It is mentioned in CUPS docs.
https://opensource.apple.com/source/cups/cups-62/doc/spm.shtml?txt#CONSTANTS
Also the fix you are proposing doesn't seem to change anything that
will help the test. It expects Collate to be checked. Doesn't it ?
The fix does not directly help the test. The idea is to have the
test call first isAttributeCategorySupprted(SheetCollate.class) and
only execute the test if it is supported. It is mentioned inthe bug
report.
Since, now our code returns false for SheetCollate attribute, my fix
will disable the collate option to prevent anomaly of returning
false for support but enabling the collate option.
Regards
Prasanta
-phil.
On 12/09/2016 12:22 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi All,
In continuation with the below mail, the issue is "collate" option
is not checked for linux.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170352
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8170352/webrev.00/
Proposed fix is to disable collate option for linux in printer dialog.
Regards
Prasanta
On 12/8/2016 4:23 PM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi Phil,
I was investigating JDK-8170352: The collate option is not
checked and I found that CUPS does not report collate as
supported attribute.
It is removed from printRequestAttrib
[http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/file/a21bac70753d/src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/print/IPPPrintService.java#l167]
so we do not look for collate-supported attribute in CUPS.
Infact, getAttMap does not have any "collate-supported" attribute
too!!
Also, this code
[http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/file/a21bac70753d/src/java.desktop/unix/classes/sun/print/IPPPrintService.java#l1062]
has been added [for 8016737]
to remove SheetCollate from supported attributes.
In light of this, I think we should disabled collate option from
our print dialog even for Toolkit based PrintJob. It seems, from
this code
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/file/a21bac70753d/src/java.desktop/share/classes/sun/print/ServiceDialog.java#l1251
it is enabled if we specify in testcase
/job.setDefaultSelection(JobAttributes.DefaultSelectionType.SELECTION);
/in which case isAWT set to true.
even though selection is determined by attribute support
[http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/file/a21bac70753d/src/java.desktop/share/classes/sun/print/ServiceDialog.java#l1320]
I could not find why it is hardcoded to setEnabled(true) for
"Selection". Do you know? mercurial history shows that line from
jdk7 and I could not find previous history.
I think there also, we should check for "scSupported" to enable
sheetcollate? Anyways, "Selection" option is not there in linux.
Please let me know your views.
Regards
Prasanta
