Mario,
Can you please request 8 backport approval for this version (which I
have approved as below)
I know some internal folks who like to see it in 8 as well and I had to
tell them you already have a fix for 8 in hand ..
The jdk-updates project is only for 9+ so the usual old 8 rules should
apply for this.
-phil.
On 10/23/2017 12:28 PM, Phil Race wrote:
Yes, that would work .. ie preserve the status quo .. not needed in 10
though, this would be 8-only.
Are you going to push the 10 version of the fix any time soon ?
-phil.
On 10/19/2017 01:59 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Philip Race <philip.r...@oracle.com>
wrote:
I think for JDK 8 you can pass down a flag to decide whether to
include or
exclude CFF.
This flag would be the value of FontUtilities.isOpenJDK() and that
should
tell us what we need.
That would preserve the status quo for Oracle JDK and it would be our
problem if the same
bug were then reported against that release.
Is something like that what you have in mind?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/8188030/webrev-jdk8.01/
Cheers,
Mario
