I would like to get some more review. Many experts met last week to discuss the model further, and there was a 3 day intense meeting earlier this year. I’m very hesitant to recommend a change in implementation at this instant in time.
S On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:53 PM Nakajima Akira <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Steven. > > ======================================================== > https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2018/18168-script-rec.pdf > from Page.2 > "The entire model for Mongolian is still under discussion" > ======================================================== > > Thanks for giving me information. > I don't know when Mongolian model will be fixed (1 year, 2 years, or > later...). > > Anyway, Windows and FireFox display Mongolian in current unicode ver. > But Java does not display about Mongolian glyph transformation. > > I guess that it is better to make it possible to display as same as > Windows/FireFox. > > This patch seems to display as same as Windows/FireFox. > And this patch's modification depends on harfbuzz. > Please anyone let me know expected trouble by applying this patch. > > > Win10 and Mongolian Art Font. > NotePad > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mnTWh1OIKSUQI3xaTM3OXemqtAbMScSS > IE11 > <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mnTWh1OIKSUQI3xaTM3OXemqtAbMScSSIE11> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1kCEZAo7YfQfcXXGkPlsCzYdVnHvzPoSy > FireFox60 > <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1kCEZAo7YfQfcXXGkPlsCzYdVnHvzPoSyFireFox60> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=17knR5oEMWdZr9kffJDrl9oB98biFo1hq > > > > and I posted to GoogleDrive that TestMongolian.java ScreenShots of > > before/after applying this patch > > <NG - before> > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1aha8xamB44f5XY6RrKYrI9t9czQuuoU2 > > <OK - after> > > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1e_oxCcoHNJQPgbEFEq9tiCEapwbWqm8j > > > Thanks. > Akira Nakajima > > > On 2018/06/22 1:14, Steven R. Loomis wrote: > > There is much discussion about the encoding of Mongolian- see > > https://www.unicode.org/L2/topical/mongolian/ > > > > Is this discussion taken into account? >
