Hi Steven. I understood your concern. Your concern is reasonable. I will leave it to your decision.
Thanks. Akira Nakajima On 2018/06/27 1:37, Steven R. Loomis wrote:
I would like to get some more review. Many experts met last week to discuss the model further, and there was a 3 day intense meeting earlier this year. I’m very hesitant to recommend a change in implementation at this instant in time. S On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:53 PM Nakajima Akira <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Steven. ======================================================== https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2018/18168-script-rec.pdf from Page.2 "The entire model for Mongolian is still under discussion" ======================================================== Thanks for giving me information. I don't know when Mongolian model will be fixed (1 year, 2 years, or later...). Anyway, Windows and FireFox display Mongolian in current unicode ver. But Java does not display about Mongolian glyph transformation. I guess that it is better to make it possible to display as same as Windows/FireFox. This patch seems to display as same as Windows/FireFox. And this patch's modification depends on harfbuzz. Please anyone let me know expected trouble by applying this patch. Win10 and Mongolian Art Font. NotePad https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mnTWh1OIKSUQI3xaTM3OXemqtAbMScSS IE11 <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1mnTWh1OIKSUQI3xaTM3OXemqtAbMScSSIE11> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1kCEZAo7YfQfcXXGkPlsCzYdVnHvzPoSy FireFox60 <https://drive.google.com/open?id=1kCEZAo7YfQfcXXGkPlsCzYdVnHvzPoSyFireFox60> https://drive.google.com/open?id=17knR5oEMWdZr9kffJDrl9oB98biFo1hq > and I posted to GoogleDrive that TestMongolian.java ScreenShots of > before/after applying this patch > <NG - before> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1aha8xamB44f5XY6RrKYrI9t9czQuuoU2 > <OK - after> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1e_oxCcoHNJQPgbEFEq9tiCEapwbWqm8j Thanks. Akira Nakajima On 2018/06/22 1:14, Steven R. Loomis wrote: > There is much discussion about the encoding of Mongolian- see > https://www.unicode.org/L2/topical/mongolian/ > > Is this discussion taken into account?
