Once again the rule of internet threads holds true; It was only a matter of
time before some called someone else a nazi, a fascist, or a Hitler. We
ought to keep track of these occurrences :^)

sean

on 7|21|00 12:45 PM, Todd Smith at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> God damn!
> 
> I truly want to believe that what you just wrote is just a big joke.  Dearly
> held?
> Hopelessly biased?  Revolutionary?  This is musical racism, and you might as
> well be
> Hitler.  Or maybe they just aren't informed enough to understand the music?
> Please
> don't write anything to the press, in fact stay away from the media as a
> whole.  You
> will only hurt the cause instead of forwarding.  This isn't elitism, or better
> than
> anything else, this is simply something we enjoy and others do or don't.  I
> think you
> need to humble yourself to the fact that you probably didn't listen to techno
> your
> whole life.  I still don't understand how you think techno is morally superior
> to
> other forms of music either.  How does music have morals?  If music did have
> morals,
> then techno has promoted more drug use, sex and smoking than any other form of
> music
> (and yes I'm including all the music in the 60's, we are the children of the
> baby
> boomers therefore there are more of us, way more).  But that is a insipid
> argument
> that I don't care to give anymore thought to.
> ah well it's all good though right, yeah right
> todd
> 
> Christina Haiser wrote:
> 
>> True, but this flies in the face of the dearly held notion that techno is
>> intellectually, if not morally, superior to other genres of dance music. Now,
>> before i'm impaled, I'm not saying it is or isn't. I will be the first to
>> admit
>> that I'm hopelessly biased. I just want to suggest that if we are to declare
>> the
>> electronic music movement to be revolutionary (and I know many of you believe
>> this), it might be a more beautiful story if no one were to be left behind.
>> Consider this, we might be right, but if someone else doesn't "get it," it
>> may be
>> for a lack of information (on several fronts), rather than inferior or even
>> different sense of aesthetics.
>> 
>> Or maybe it is just all good.
>> 
>> --tina
>> 
>> Giles Dickerson wrote:
>> 
>>> or maybe techno just wasn't her thing? i don't think it's faire to knock
>>> someone's taste because they don't get what you do. that kneejerk reaction
>>> of
>>> being defensive when someone is critical of your likes dislikes is the kiss
>>> of
>>> death for any artist. it's best to just be comfortable with the fact that
>>> this
>>> music is for some people and not for others. isn't that the beauty of it?
>>> 
>>> // giles
>>> 
>>> FC3 Richards wrote:
>>> 
>>>> i spun techno at a house party and a girl told me that she didn't like it
>>>> because there were no buildups or break downs.  i think she just wanted to
>>>> hear cheesey synth and snare rolls.
>>>> jeff
>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: James Bucknell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 8:48 AM
>>>>> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Cc:   [email protected]
>>>>> Subject:      [313]In the Ghetto (was Richie Hawtin is the future of
>>>>> Detroit Techno.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> neither the ghetto nor the suburbs are the future of techno.
>>>>> 
>>>>> in the ghetto people don't listen to techno--they think it's white boy
>>>>> music
>>>>> from england.
>>>>> the kids in the suburbs don't listen to techno. they listen to trance and
>>>>> drum n
>>>>> bass.
>>>>> 
>>>>> in the u.s. techno will probably just continue to be the preserve of a
>>>>> small
>>>>> dedicated group.
>>>>> 
>>>>> i'm putting my thoery to the test. i'm meant to spin at my block party in
>>>>> harlem
>>>>> on saturday. i figure i'm going to get hit with a flying bottle before i
>>>>> mix out
>>>>> of the first track.
>>>>> james
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Reply via email to