It never dawned on me, GAL was just taking off when I lived in Japan.
But the Black Japan reference could actually be a name check to GAL,
but I'm not sure.

full illustrated guide to GAL taxonomy here

http://japanlinked.com/Japanese-Culture/Gyaru-Gal-Styles.html

thanks,

Jeffrey J. Davis
President & COO, AGY
fon: +1.218.8332847 (21883DAVIS)
fax: +1.803.643.4085
cel: +86.158.0184.9459
[email protected] / [email protected]
jeffrey.james.davis JeffreyJDavis

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Robert Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Perhaps it refers to the rather bizarre Ganguros youth subculture:
>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganguro
>
>
> Rob Taylor
> VT Librarian
> x8599
> Hatch Desk x1088
>  VT Library Users' Guide
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Powers [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 25 March 2010 13:54
> To: 313
> Subject: Re: (313) AUX88
>
> I think that "Black" really refers to pan-African culture, not skin
> color per se... I think it's no different than saying, say, "Polish
> Paris Project" (i.e. the music of Chopin). I don't find anything
> offensive about it.
>
> ~David
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Odeluga, Ken <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> > It's also not clear what Black Tokyo Project is - and to be honest there is 
> > something about the name which to me, seems dumb.
> >
> > What is it? Music? Art? Blacks In Tokyo? Why 'Black' anyway?
> >
> > Black people you mean? That would be faintly patronizing in my view, if it 
> > was referring or alluding to that some sort of cultural jam. That might not 
> > be intentionally offensive, but it's still referenced by skin colour. How 
> > very 70s!
> >
> > Maybe 'Black' as an aesthetic term?
> >
> > Dumb, dumb dumb.
> >
> > If I was Aux 88 I'd be hesitant in associating with this project as it 
> > could cast them in as dubious a light as the project itself - which would 
> > be a shame as the group are justifiably well respected for their music.
> >
> > Check this out:
> >
> > http://www.blacktokyo.com/?p=2923
> >
> > It's nothing to do with the Aux 88-linked project, I think, but it's in the 
> > same orbit.
> >
> > Perhaps there would be a good reason for Aux 88 being involved in such a 
> > project if it had worthwhile aims.
> >
> > But it would need to be well-thought through and I would suggest it ought 
> > to be at the behest of Aux 88, or people like Aux 88 in Japan.
> >
> > Ken
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: robin [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 12:04 AM
> > To: Frank Glazer
> > Cc: 313 List
> > Subject: Re: (313) AUX88
> >
> > Sounded like it had been through a translator....twice :)
> >
> > robin...
> >
> > On 23 Mar 2010, at 23:07, Frank Glazer <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> You know, I love Aux 88.  love love love.  but when i read some
> >> nonsense like "intelligent dance music as well as business and fashion
> >> ventures" am i wrong to snoooooooore and tune out?  i mean, come on, i
> >> know it's cool to try to make a little cash, but am i the only one who
> >> thinks musicians should stick to music, and that fashion is some
> >> bullship?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:09 AM, robin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Short interview about the Black Tokyo project:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.fabriclondon.com/fabricfirst/blog/aux-88-introduce-black-t
> >>> okyo/
> >>>
> >>> Tommy using NI's Maschine:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXa3hf8FiFk
> >>>
> >>> robin...
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> peace,
> >>
> >> frank
> >>
> >> dj mix archive:  http://www.deejaycountzero.com
> >
> #####################################################################################
> Note:
>
> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent
> those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
> email
> and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
> the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
> email in
> error, please notify [email protected]
>
> Thank You.
>
> Channel Four Television Corporation, created by statute under English law, is 
> at 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX .
>
> 4 Ventures Limited (Company No. 04106849), incorporated in England and Wales 
> has its registered office at 124 Horseferry Road, London SW1P 2TX.
>
> VAT no: GB 626475817
>
> #####################################################################################

Reply via email to