Hippy! 

On 18 Jun 2013, at 16:29, David Powers <[email protected]> wrote:

> Rob,
> 
> Laugh all you want, but to me DJing is a HUGE responsibility, it is
> about connecting to a spiritual tradition thousands of years old.
> Music has the power to heal, and create very special states of
> consciousness. It also has the power to create quite negative states
> of consciousness.
> 
> If you examine the way traditional musicians in, for example, West
> Africa view music, you would understand what I'm talking about. I have
> a friend who is a drummer, from West Africa. He is a griot and is
> descended from a family of griots. If you don't know, griots are
> musician/story-tellers, and through music they are responsible for
> telling the story of their people, as well as healing and other such
> things. I see the true role of a contemporary DJ as being a modern
> type of griot. They should tell a story through their records, and
> connect to history and a deeper tradition through their selection of
> music.
> 
> A DJ has an incredible amount of power over their audience. In my
> opinion, those who don't take such power seriously, have no business
> DJing. They may actually be negatively impacting the well being of
> their audience. I do believe that bad music can literally make people
> sick in a psycho-spiritual sense!
> 
> ~dp
> 
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Rob Taylor
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I am laughing at the idea of a 'serious dance DJ'.
>> 
>> 
>> On 18 Jun 2013, at 15:56, David Powers <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> If you are a radio DJ, sure, but from the viewpoint of a serious dance
>>> DJ I would definitely would want an edit for these reasons:
>>> 
>>> 1. Most important, at minimum you need to loop up something at
>>> beginning and end for mixing into and out of
>>> 
>>> 2. Typical pop song structure is too short for the dance floor, it
>>> really makes it's point as quickly as possible and suddenly the song
>>> is over. This doesn't create the type of altered state of
>>> consciousness you want for dancers; to me dancing is very spiritual
>>> and you want music/rhythms that are conducive to attaining a real
>>> trance state, without needing drugs. I am not really a big fan of your
>>> normal pop music formulate, it's very limiting.
>>> 
>>> 3. For me personally, the chorus is a bit too epic and cheese, I'd
>>> prefer to somehow tone it down somehow, filter and otherwise dub it
>>> out, and probably would only let it appear once, not multiple times as
>>> in normal pop song structure. The verse works for me, but it so
>>> clearly leads into the chorus that it probably needs to still occur
>>> before the chorus. So, if I was editing it, I would definitely focus
>>> on the intro bit, and the bridge with the keyboard solo; that changes
>>> it from a pop song into a dance track...
>>> 
>>> 4. The type of production is really a mismatch in a set of house and
>>> techno records, basically in terms of the drums. Adding a bit of drum
>>> machine really makes it work better on the dance floor. (Remember...
>>> This is EXACTLY what the originators of house were doing with some
>>> disco records!)
>>> 
>>> Just one man's opinion, I'm sure others disagree, but as someone who
>>> has released edits, perhaps the above will explain what it is that
>>> drives me to do a bunch of work to alter a song that is already a
>>> "good song"... in a nutshell, the radio pop song form is quite
>>> different from the type of form I prefer as a DJ. There might be
>>> exceptions when I do play a pop song if I figure out a brilliant way
>>> to mix it in, or it's the last song in a set, or for some reason I
>>> want to surprise people, but it's not something I would do often.
>>> 
>>> ~dp
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Paul Kendrick <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I must say I think Africa is a classic and doesn't need an
>>>> edit/remix/whatever....just play the original...
>>>> 
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Rob Taylor [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: 17 June 2013 15:45
>>>> To: David Powers
>>>> Cc: Wibo Lammerts; Daniel Bean; benny blanco®; list 313
>>>> 
>>>> Subject: Re: (313) Depeche Mode - Personal Jesus remix
>>>> 
>>>> Quite, David.
>>>> And if you don't like the song in the first place, you have cloth ears and
>>>> your opinion is worthless!
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:31 PM, David Powers <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I could imagine a Toto "Africa" edit being decent, actually, I would
>>>>> have to hear it and judge for myself. I am not sure why  one would
>>>>> assume it's no good without hearing it?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Haven't heard that Quentin REM remix, that one does seem like a
>>>>> stretch; even so, in Quentin's defense, most of his output is pretty
>>>>> good and some of his remixes and PURE GOLD (I am not going to tell you
>>>>> which ones though, that would be to easy)... Nobody knows anything
>>>>> about them and they KILL the dancefloor every time. If anybody hasn't
>>>>> done digging through his back catalog, I would highly recommend it!!!
>>>>> Those are some of my ultimate secret weapons.
>>>>> 
>>>>> ~David
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Wibo Lammerts <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Seriously? An edit of Toto? Really? That's like a Quentin Harris remix
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> "Losing my religion" by REM. Which exists, and totally sucks.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2013/6/13 Daniel Bean <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Haha
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> From: Wibo Lammerts [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>>> Sent: 13 June 2013 15:54
>>>>>>> To: Rob Taylor
>>>>>>> Cc: benny blanco®; list 313
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: (313) Depeche Mode - Personal Jesus remix
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That's the C2 HypeMachine in full effect, and you fell for it! Shame!
>>>>>>> ;)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 2013/6/13 Rob Taylor <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> the way he described it made it sound awesome!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Wibo Lammerts <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think I heard that one, a while ago. and it is as bad as one could
>>>>>>> imagine.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 2013/6/13 Rob Taylor <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> speaking of dodgy remixes, Carl Craig was speaking with Joe Muggs in a
>>>>>>> Resident Advisor podcast recently (
>>>>>>> http://www.residentadvisor.net/podcast-episode.aspx?exchange=149 ), and
>>>>>>> he
>>>>>>> mentioned a remix/re-edit or maybe even a re-recording of Toto's Africa
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> he played at London's Plastic People club. I have a soft spot for this
>>>>>>> tune,
>>>>>>> so would be curious to find out what he meant. Anyone know?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:39 PM, benny blanco® <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I thought this 'tribal' interpretation was pretty blah as well.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The new DM Single, 'Soothe My Soul' has an interesting remix take by ZZ
>>>>>>> Top.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4bPH2U40jAU
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> benny blanco®
>>>>>>> blancodisco.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:22 AM, kent williams <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> No offense intended, but my reaction on first listen to that track is
>>>>>>> that it is hilariously bad. I can imagine it might work on the
>>>>>>> dancefloor -- punters on their 5th hour of thrashing about do love to
>>>>>>> hear something they recognize -- but after the third minute of those
>>>>>>> claves mixed too high I wanted to shoot the producer.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:09 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Found it.
>>>>>>>> Jamie 3:26 sent me the link
>>>>>>>> https://soundcloud.com/polyrhythm-1/personal-jesus-mktl-polyrhythm
>>>>>>>> Thanks anyway guys
>>>>>>>> And DAMN!!!! It wasnt David Morales... It was John Morales from NY
>>>>>>>> :):)
>>>>>>>> Haha
>>>>>>>> Peace
>>>>>>>> Ed
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>> From:
>>>>>>>> "Diego Simak" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> To:
>>>>>>>> "Daniel Bean" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>>>> "edward thompson" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> Sent:
>>>>>>>> Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:32:04 -0300
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Subject:
>>>>>>>> Re: (313) Depeche Mode - Personal Jesus remix
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> yes it is
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 2013/6/10 Daniel Bean <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> That’s pretty dire.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> From: Diego Simak [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>>>>> Sent: 10 June 2013 13:36
>>>>>>>>> To: edward thompson
>>>>>>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: (313) Depeche Mode - Personal Jesus remix
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xLvArgSp3k
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 2013/6/10 edward thompson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>>>> I went to 2 parties today (David Morales during the day and Jamie
>>>>>>>>> 3:26
>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> night and at both gigs Depeche Mode - Personal Jesus remix was
>>>>>>>>> played.
>>>>>>>>> An
>>>>>>>>> absolute dance floor killer of a track. Must be relatively new.
>>>>>>>>> Does anyone know what the remix is and who did it?
>>>>>>>>> Id say all the big boys would be playing it atm.
>>>>>>>>> Peace
>>>>>>>>> Ed
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk
>>>>>>>>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain
>>>>>>>>> personal
>>>>>>>>> views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
>>>>>>>>> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
>>>>>>>>> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
>>>>>>>>> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
>>>>>>>>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
>>>>>>>>> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> | http://soundcloud.com/w1b0 | http://vibedeck.com/wibo/ |
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/w1b0 |
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> | http://soundcloud.com/w1b0 | http://vibedeck.com/wibo/ |
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/w1b0 |
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://www.bbc.co.uk
>>>>>>> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain
>>>>>>> personal
>>>>>>> views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
>>>>>>> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
>>>>>>> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
>>>>>>> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
>>>>>>> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
>>>>>>> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ---------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> | http://soundcloud.com/w1b0 | http://vibedeck.com/wibo/ |
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/w1b0 |
>>>>>> --
>>>> 
>>>> 

Reply via email to