They may well be doing that. Regardless, Eliot would not be (re: his intent,
anyway) properly regarded as in support of pomo by any stetch. I certainly
wouldn't argue that for Foucalt - neither would I put him in the same
'intentional' boat in terms of theory, either. Fun discussion, but it may be
time to take it off-list (before we get told to :-)
jeff
Bekka wrote:
> > Crit, Eliot himself basically WAS New Criticism - a subset of
> > Formalism - and
> > is a far cry from things normally associated (e.g.,
> > post-structuralism, etc)
> > with pomo. Just looking for understanding here, not
> > one-upsmanship.
>
> Actually not really. Issues and reserach in areas newer such as cultural
> production and intellectual property law are increasingly amalgating ideas
> from folks such as Eliot and Foucault etc. when talking about popular
> culture especially.
>
> While i'm at it...I'm in the process of lookin at a bunch of sites but
> anyone know anywhere else i can get some info on the whole Sony vs. UR thing
> or if anything's happened recently?
>
> thanks a bunch,
>
> bekka =)
>
> Shop online without a credit card
> http://www.rocketcash.com
> RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
jeff
?/~THINK OUTSIDE OF YOUR SITCOM~\!
ICQ904008 (but I'm never on)
----> http://www.freedonation.com (costs you nothing. try it)
