> > The fact is, he played very little 140bpm boom-boom-boom
>
> Which must have been the hour-or so that I caught. Around 4:30 - 6am.

I was speaking w/ a hawtin fan about his recent tendencies toward
hard repetitive stuff- and they were trying to tell me that he uses the
hard stuff to weed people out of the crowd early on- for instance,
playing hard banging stuff so that the only people who stay are those that
want to just dance to anything and let the dj control them- then after an
hour or two he gets into funkier and more fun stuff. i cant really comment
because the last couple times i've seen him - i did leave within the first
hour :) anyone have any thoughts on this idea?

ps- my two cents: hawtin has demonstrated great skills, concepts and
innovations consistently over the years in terms of musical output and
production techniques, but as far as music at parties, i much prefer the
'93 - '96 hawtin than anything i've heard recently.

pete
>
> > Please don't speak about partys you did not attend.
>
> Sorry, I *was* in attendance for a portion of the night.  Not my cup of tea
> anymore, but he was obviously having a great time, and the crowd (what I
> could see of them) dug it.
>
> Perspective helps.  If Richie held a "control" party every weekend in a new
> city, I'd worry about his sanity, ears, and liver.  But this was a chance to
> go over the top.  I'm looking forward to his next release, just to see if he
> can sucessfully develop beyond the DE9 concept...
> --
> im
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to