isnt 4.5 maurizio, not bc, but same thing, but ... well you know what i mean :)))
berislav ----- Original Message ----- From: "scotto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:05 PM Subject: Re: [313] bc > I have a couple question in the same vein. probaly be answered by a list > member. > > why is BC 01 so different from the rest of there work. it's quite banging > for them. > > with BC 04 and 04.5 why not release it as a double pack? and why is one side > of 4.5 so short. IMO it's not worth the whole album side. > > scotto > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] Org" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 2:54 AM > Subject: [313] bc > > > > Whilst we're on the subject, I'd like to ask something which I wouldn't > > waste bc's time with in an interview, but which I'd love to know: > > > > How come/why was 'Cyrus' quite different (discrete) from all of the other > > output? True it has a dubby, hypnotic flavor also, but it is more akin to > > Scan 7 than Studio 1. > > > > Plus - the title, 'Cyrus;' historically, a benevolent, progressive > > patriarch. Could it be an obvious tribute to a Detroit figure? > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
