Langsman, Marc wrote on Wed, 4 Sep 2002 about following: > >mmm i dunno. i just usually think that tracks are done for some tempo > >for some reason. and i like to keep the tracks as they were > >intended to > >be. > > Surely by that rational you wouldn't be impressed by someone cutting up a > track as it was originally intended to be one whole piece of music ??
.. i was talking about the tempo. > Personally I dislike the side-effects of speeding stuff up however its great > for mixing in super old skool tunes with more uptempo modern sets. For > example I often like to stick in mj loops or de la stuff at +7/8 [I havent > fiddled with the pitch in my 12's]. Ideally if I had f/s or vinyl touch > there wouldnt be a problem in this department. i still wonder why you need to make it faster? just play them as they are. and remember kids, you can play slower stuff and then just change to faster stuff without beatmixing. it's not all about MIXING the tracks, it's all about the right selection. also, you can find modern tracks to build the set up from the supaoldskool tracks to faster tempos easily. i personally rather listen music unmixed than listening to someone forcefully trying to mix stuff that don't fit together. sakke -- random rants and links at: http://www.arabuusimiehet.com/sakke/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
