That he's got 30 records. And the suggestion that he doesn't buy records. I
could care less (or in the uk, I *couldn't* care less) abt how good or bad
his set was (he's good when I've seen him, maybe u guy weren't so lucky) but
at least let's talk sense!

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 11:31 AM
>To: Odeluga, Ken; Jim Bishop; [email protected]
>Subject: RE: (313) Mills and hawtin at movement (private replies)
>
>
>What is untrue?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Odeluga, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 7:58 AM
>To: Jim Bishop; [email protected]
>Subject: RE: (313) Mills and hawtin at movement (private replies)
>
>
>This is pretty unjustified if not downright stupid by virtue of being
>patently untrue.
>k
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jim Bishop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:39 PM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: (313) Mills and hawtin at movement (private replies)
>>
>>
>>I made a post about mills and hawtin letting us down. Since then I have
>>gotten 14 "private" emails from people who totally agree.
>>
>>Don¹t worry people you can agree in public, Jeff Mills wont shoot you
>>through your email. :0
>>
>>On a side note, has anyone ever seen jeff mills at a record store, you see
>>many other dj's going shopping in various cities but does mills.
>>If not then
>>he damn well should, we heard his same 30 tracks enough already. ;)
>>
>>
>###################################################################
>##################
>Note:
>
>Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not
>necessarily represent
>those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically
>stated. This email
>and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for
>the use of the
>individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have
>received this email in
>error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Thank You.
>###################################################################
>##################
>

Reply via email to