I think maybe what David was trying to say is there is a series of 
exchanges, a dialetic? I am sure no one here would dispute that
African-Americans have been the driving force behind today's pop cultures. I
think you guys are in agreement. There's just been a misunderstanding
because of the medium of the Internet.



> Its discussions like this that really makes me hate techno and everyone that
> goes with it.
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: Sylvia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Sent: 18 June 2003 23:52
> |To: David Powers
> |Cc: [email protected]
> |Subject: RE: (313) Soul Music (was some nonsense spw was going
> |on about)
> |
> |
> |>because African-Americans have always borrowed from
> |>the white European tradition,
> |
> |Borrowed ? say What ? Kind of comment can just come from a
> |perfect imbecile who is a waste of human flesh, and his only
> |use on this earth is to take up space, God knows why, thank
> |you very much for your brilliant comments, I much appreciated
> |meantime let me tell you that:
> |
> |The music was a product of the existing environment of the
> |time in which the musicians who created it lived..  social and
> |political striking periods of black people in  America, have
> |always been accompanied with a new musical genre, as an
> |example Period of Soul is roughly defined as 1955 - 1970. It
> |very much parallels the Civil Rights movement.
> |
> |- African roots music 1619! brought to us Negro spirituals 1825-1850
> |- Negro spiritual "antique Gospel" Music brought to us Gospel
> |music: 1890 then Rhythm and Blues as BLUES: early 1900s and
> |then Jazz: 1920
> |- Gospel and R&B brought to us Soul
> |- Jazz brought to us Funk
> |
> |I wonder how you can be daily, next, go alongside to people of
> |which you do not even know the life, the existence, the
> |history ...the roots!
> |
> |Take some teach on my web at
> |http://www.guerrillafunk.com/thoughts/doc1788.html
> |
> |And let me quote myself from an email that I sent to this same
> |list on March 6th 2002!
> |
> |"Yeah, it is...but a lot of things used to be "black people"
> |music too. Although jazz was pioneered by black artists...who
> |is the most well known "jazz" musician today? Kenny G? (What
> |happened to Coltrane and Miles Davis?) Although blues music
> |was pioneered by black artists...who is the most well known
> |blues musician today? Stevie Ray Vaughn? (What happened to
> |Muddy Waters, Albert King and Robert Johnson? Even Robert
> |Cray?)
> |And although rock was pioneered by black artists...who is the
> |most well loved and respected rock group in the world? The
> |Beatles? (What happened to Little Richard , Chuck Berry, and
> |Bo Diddley?) Apathy. People didn't care, they didn't pay
> |attention to what was going on, they didn't take a
> |stand...they supported what was "safe", "common",
> |"predictable", "expected"...just like Living Colour's record
> |company did with the cover of their first album...they didn't
> |and dont' challenge the "presumed wisdom" of the day...and so
> |much of this music (Black Music?) has died. They largely did
> |this because, they were comfortable and complacent in the
> |cultural resonance they were receiving from MI at the time -
> |and the fact that the music industry was successful in keeping
> |them pacified in this way. Same game today? They were content
> |with their "Bread and Circuses"...  It's hard to say. .."
> |
> |
> ||-----Original Message-----
> ||From: David Powers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ||Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:31 PM
> ||To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Powers
> ||Cc: [email protected]
> ||Subject: RE: (313) Soul Music (was some nonsense spw was going on
> ||about)
> ||
> ||
> ||Great post.  I may have been misinformed, I was thinking
> |about it more
> ||in terms of the classifying of music by the record labels than the
> ||meaning of the music for the people who made it.  Now I'm trying to
> ||remember which label it was that the record industry used,
> |maybe it was
> ||R&B?
> ||
> ||And actually, I have to admit that the concept of "soul" you are
> ||speaking about does not require any kind of metaphysics and
> |could be a
> ||very useful Idea.  I come from a very conservative white Christian
> ||background where "soul" is used as an extremely repressive idea and
> ||justifies oppresion rather than encouraging people to seek
> |for a better
> ||life here on earth.  So what is really interesting is that
> ||African-Americans took a notion from their oppresors and transformed
> ||it, took it down a life of flight so that it became a liberating
> ||concept.
> ||
> ||And if you think about it in terms of music, this is really
> |interesting
> ||because African-Americans have always borrowed from the white
> |European
> ||tradition, but at the same time have often been successful at
> ||liberating these elements from their hierarchical origins and
> |set them
> ||in motion, into a continuous variation where the elements that are
> ||ripped from their foundation in an oppresive hierarchical Culture now
> ||enter into free play and communicate with all the other elements of
> ||music.  A continuous line of variation rather than a strict code of
> ||meaning.  (On the other hand there is always a Winton Marsalis at the
> ||end of the line trying to block the development, saying "our
> |music is a
> ||CLASSICAL music", hip hop, techno and free jazz, well THAT doesn't
> ||swing, that's not real music, that's not our identity, we
> |need to find
> ||our place as an extension of Western Culture.)
> ||
> ||313 people, you might think I'm off topic but really I'm
> |talking about
> ||things like jazz chords, instrumental virtuosity, 808, 909, 303, DIY
> ||use of technology, sampler; all the elements of Detroit techno can be
> ||understood very well in this context.
> ||
> ||dave
> ||
> ||
> ||---------- Original Message -------------
> ||Subject: RE: (313) Soul Music (was some nonsense spw was going on
> ||about)
> ||Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 01:41:17 +0200
> ||From: "Sylvia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ||To: "David Powers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ||
> ||
> ||
> |||>On the other hand, "Soul Music" as a genre was a just a
> |euphimism for
> |||"black music", and doesn't have anything >to do with "soul" as a
> |||spiritual or metaphysical concept.
> ||
> ||Euphemism ????
> ||
> ||'blues' is without hope and that its singers accept their conditions
> ||without complaint or expectation of anything better. Soul borrowed an
> ||expectation of
> ||a better world from gospel, but translate it into a worldly context as
> ||opposed to a religious one. Gospel gives soul its optimism because it
> ||believes in a better world in heaven, soul starts looking for
> |that better
> ||world on earth.
> ||
> ||Soul Music is the product of ever evolving social conditions and a
> ||diversity of musical influences
> ||Soul Music is about the problems faced by groups of people, not of
> ||individuals
> ||Soul Music is about poverty and day to day drudgery
> ||Soul Music is the belief that circumstances can improve
> ||Soul Music is about realism, it is not blinkered by romantic ideals
> ||The 'Moan' is a defining characteristic of Soul Music
> ||Soul Music is tolerant
> ||Soul Music is.....
> ||
> ||Euphemism, psssst, dubya! but yes understanding Soul Music can just
> ||escape from a brain with 2 neurons without connector.
> ||
> ||
> ||
> |||-----Original Message-----
> |||From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |||[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |||Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 12:58 AM
> |||To: David Powers
> |||Cc: [email protected]; spw
> |||Subject: RE: (313) Soul Music (was some nonsense spw was going on
> |||about)
> |||
> |||
> |||
> |||>On the other hand, "Soul Music" as a genre was a just a
> |euphimism for
> |||"black music", and doesn't have anything >to do with "soul" as a
> |||spiritual or metaphysical concept.
> |||
> |||The hell it doesn't have a spiritual concept! Where the hell do you
> |||think Soul music came from?
> |||
> |||Listen to Ray Charles man, and then tell me that there isn't a
> |||spiritual side to Soul music - one of the biggest influences on Soul
> |||music was the church. All those singers - All Green, Mavis Staple,
> |||Aretha Franklin, and so many more got their start in the church.
> |||That's not to say that Soul = Gospel but there in a huge
> |influence of
> |||Gospel on Soul. Soul music is the merging of the spiritual with the
> |||physical - that's why it's so great to dance to... it satisfies the
> |||body, mind and "soul". (That's why I love the term "High
> |Tech Soul" =
> |||Techno or "Techno Soul")
> |||
> |||MEK
> |||
> |||
> |||
> ||
> ||
> ||
> ||
> |

Reply via email to