You haven't heard of the new technoclash phenom... opps have I said too much
already?

;)

----------
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "Robert Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: (313) Pete Tong
>Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 1:18 AM
>

>
>
>
>
> Hmmm, I can see that but when was the last time techno was really popular?
> 1995 to 98 maybe? Seems then the music was pretty kicking and everyone was
> looking toward Detroit or Chicago.
> I doubt it would be the same again but maybe someone out there will be
> inspired by it - search it out, attened techno events, go home and instead
> of making a crap trance tune come up with some brilliant techno track.
> Could happen -not going to hold my breath but it could happen
>
> techno, like disco, is a survivor
>
> MEK
>
>
>
>
>                       "Robert Taylor"
>
>                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>
>                       4.co.uk>                 cc:
>
>                                                Subject:  RE: (313) Pete
> Tong
>                       10/20/03 10:25 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I don't. It'll only get diluted and homogenised if it becomes any more
> popular.
>  I like my music to stay underground!
> Nobody likes an overcrowded beach.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 2:10 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: (313) Pete Tong
>
>
>
>>god forbid the rest of the world hears "our" music...
>
> I never meant it in a bad way, just that it amazed me a little as I havent
> taken my head out of my arse for about 4 years.
>
> In fact, I see it as a positive thing (I think)
> _________________________________________________________________
>
> --------------------- End of message text --------------------
>
> This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
> individual, non-business capacity and is not on
> behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
>
> PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
> e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and
> telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you
> give your consent to such monitoring
>
>
>
>
############################################################################
#########
>
>
> Note:
>
> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent
> those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
> This email
> and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use
> of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
> email in
> error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thank You.
>
############################################################################
#########
>
>
>
>
>
> 

Reply via email to